Magazine


READ NOW

last update Friday, April 28, 2017
  

 



tags
 
#  #  # #



To portray alternative corporate growth strategies, Igor Ansoff presented a matrix that focused on the firm's present and potential products and markets (customers). By considering ways to grow via existing products and new products, and in existing markets and new markets, there are four possible product-market combinations. Ansoff's matrix is shown below:

Ansoff Matrix

  Existing Products New Products
Existing
Markets


Market Penetration




    Product Development    


New
Markets


    Market Development    




Diversification




Ansoff's matrix provides four different growth strategies:

  • Market Penetration - the firm seeks to achieve growth with existing products in their current market segments, aiming to increase its market share.

  • Market Development - the firm seeks growth by targeting its existing products to new market segments.

  • Product Development - the firms develops new products targeted to its existing market segments.

  • Diversification - the firm grows by diversifying into new businesses by developing new products for new markets.


Selecting a Product-Market Growth Strategy

The market penetration strategy is the least risky since it leverages many of the firm's existing resources and capabilities. In a growing market, simply maintaining market share will result in growth, and there may exist opportunities to increase market share if competitors reach capacity limits. However, market penetration has limits, and once the market approaches saturation another strategy must be pursued if the firm is to continue to grow.

Market development options include the pursuit of additional market segments or geographical regions. The development of new markets for the product may be a good strategy if the firm's core competencies are related more to the specific product than to its experience with a specific market segment. Because the firm is expanding into a new market, a market development strategy typically has more risk than a market penetration strategy.

A product development strategy may be appropriate if the firm's strengths are related to its specific customers rather than to the specific product itself. In this situation, it can leverage its strengths by developing a new product targeted to its existing customers. Similar to the case of new market development, new product development carries more risk than simply attempting to increase market share.

Diversification is the most risky of the four growth strategies since it requires both product and market development and may be outside the core competencies of the firm. In fact, this quadrant of the matrix has been referred to by some as the "suicide cell". However, diversification may be a reasonable choice if the high risk is compensated by the chance of a high rate of return. Other advantages of diversification include the potential to gain a foothold in an attractive industry and the reduction of overall business portfolio risk.



       
 

The End, what is next?


Note: the page content was squeezed for you with a focus on , by Paperfree Magazine Team, editor -  
 



Go ahead and share it!


check this out, Ansoff Matrix 



Want more content related to "" ? Subscribe PaperFree  Magazine! 

We will send an email from PaperFree Magazine with the top content on this subject: , .






Partners Network Center
Papefree Places Core Features




paperfree
paperfree
paperfree

 










Copyright © 2020 PaperFree, Inc. All rights reserved. | About | Feedback  | Powered by PaperFree 

NOMINATE CONTENT